On Voting Rights, Test of History v. Progress – NYTimes.com

By Cara | April 28, 2009

By ADAM LIPTAK

Published: April 27, 2009

WASHINGTON — Ellen D. Katz is a liberal law professor and a big fan of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which she calls the most effective civil rights legislation in American history. “It’s sacred,” she said. “It’s holy.”

But Professor Katz is torn about what the Supreme Court should do in a case asking it to strike down a central part of the law. She cannot shake the feeling that the election of the nation’s first black president has changed everything.

“This election was momentous,” said Professor Katz, who teaches voting rights and legal history at the University of Michigan, “and it arguably presents the moment when Congress should close out this regime.”

read more via On Voting Rights, Test of History v. Progress – NYTimes.com.

Topics: Issues, newsletter | 1 Comment »

One Response to “On Voting Rights, Test of History v. Progress – NYTimes.com”

  1. Cara
    10:49 am on April 28th, 2009

    I do not agree that the voting rights act should be edited – there needs to be a net in place so that people can appeal to the legal system to find justice.

Comments

  • Change font size

  • Subscribe to my newsletter

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

  • RSSSen. Claire McCaskill tweets

    • I'm loving my new gadget (no,no,no.. the govt didn't pay for it), a mobile wifi hotspot from Sprint. 4G fast. Now I can work anywhere.
    • Fox and Friends in the am.Talking about our hearing Thurs on tragic incompetence that resulted in lost remains at Arlington Nat'l Cemetery.
    • Great day in Columbia. Met with folks at Shelter Ins, and meetings with our nationally known Food & Ag Policy Research Institute at MU.